Subscribe: by Email | in Reader

Sonnet -- To Science -- Edgar Allan Poe

Guest poem submitted by E. Brooke :
(Poem #1528) Sonnet -- To Science
 Science! true daughter of Old Time thou art!
   Who alterest all things with thy peering eyes.
 Why preyest thou thus upon the poet's heart,
   Vulture, whose wings are dull realities?
 How should he love thee? or deem thee wise?
   Who wouldst not leave him in his wandering
 To seek for treasure in the jeweled skies,
   Albeit he soared with an undaunted wing?
 Hast thou not dragged Diana from her car?
   And driven the Hamadryad from the wood
 To seek a shelter in some happier star?
   Has thou not torn the Naiad from her flood,
 The Elfin from the green grass, and from me
 The summer dream beneath the tamarind tree?
-- Edgar Allan Poe
        (1829, 1845)

   Under the traditional Shakespearean sonnet structure, Poe expresses
nontraditional accusations for science.  Like mostly all Poe's poems, it is
a psychological study of a speaker suffering the most human of flaws.  In
this case, it is spoken through the tunnel vision of a passionate man
mourning the slaughter of mythology, fantasy, art by its alleged archenemy,
Science.  He questions the desertion of the imagination by the objective
force of science.  He is inclined to avoid logic in his argument, although
the classic sonnet structure implies his own attempt to rationalize his own
thoughts.  Perhaps the structure contrasted with such unreigned feelings
further insinuates humanity's paradoxical need for organization in every
field of thought, including the self-proclaimed resisters of logic.
   You cannot fully trust this speaker.  He is borderline obsessive, which
blinds him to truth through moderation.  He constrains his thinking to one
side of the spectrum where he is unable to see the interconnection between
science and art.  He prophesizes ultimate death approaching poetry through
science's "peering eyes."  He is scared -- if not for himself -- then for
art in general, for the obliteration of his ability to dream.  Herein lies
the speaker's hypocrisy.  Although he speaks wildly about his disrespect for
science because it disallows for fantasy and dreaming, he adheres to the
logic applied to poetry as demonstrated by the conventional sonnet
structure.
   This is a beautiful poem, rich with layers to every aspect.  The concept
of remaining open-minded to every field of thought is one that is relevant
to every human being since ignorance breeds ignorance.  To modern readers,
especially now during the age of skepticism, this poem rings true since the
current emphasis and faith has been placed on science to supply truth.  The
speaker is microcosmic of most of humanity, for he believes there is a gap
between science and art.
   Nothing could be further from Truth.
   Poetry and art are not in opposition to science in its perception of
reality.  Rather, poetry uncovers another level of reality that science
cannot, and vice versa.  While the path of scientific fact is one way to
discover truth, so is the path of fantasy.  They are as interconnected and
interdependent as land and ocean.
   We should all consider our own biases.

11 comments: ( or Leave a comment )

gerald said...

From Gerald McCunn

Since experience clearly demonstrates that all Truth is very much a
moveable feast, why might one not dream and fantasize upon the path or
form it may take? Then we can all be happy!

Lieven Marchand said...

I think Richard Feynman made a great response to this complaint:

...far more marvelous is the truth than any artists of the past imagined
it. Why do the poets of the present not speak of it? What men are poets
who can speak of Jupiter if he were a man, but if he is an immense
spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?

Anonymous said...

For me, mathematicians, physicist, artists, etc. all see the world and try to represent it in some abstract form. The physicist might represent the relationships between things with an exact equation while the artists might represents it on a canvas. There is the artistic in science and the scientific in art and any attempt to limit either is folly of the human brain.

Anonymous said...

I disagree with the premise of this analysis, as a historical reading of "To Science" gives us a much broader understanding of the debate raging at the time. Between 1825-1830, scientific inquiry had reached a crossroads between Neo-Classicism and Baconian logic and modern German Idealism and the American Transcendentalism. Science during this age was romanticized, and it was during this time that the American philosopher began turning to Science instead of religion to quantify truth.

Placed in this context, I argue that Poe was not criticizing all science, but was rebelling against the inductive, anti-theoretical method science had utilized up until this point. By referring to the Hamadryad and the Naiad (both nymphs who were inseparably connected to their element), I believe that he was drawing a direct correlation between man's understanding of himself (Emerson's "intuition" and "imagination") and man's understanding of nature.

This poem could also be read as prophetic; with the Westward Expansion and the coming of the industrial revolution, Diana (the representation of wildlife, the woodlands, and aloofness) being pulled from her car could be a criticism of man's dominance over nature. This would reflect the common sentiment that man best understood himself when he came to a unique perception of the universe, untainted by interfering ideas.

In short, "To Science," is not an argument against Science, but embraces Romanticism.

Invertir en oro said...

Hello friend, I read your post and it seems very interesting, I wish we were in touch, too,

can visit my site

Inversiones en petroleo said...

Hello. I would like to congratulate you for the post, is very good, also I like a lot of

reading and researching topics related to your post

inversiones en oro said...

hello, this post is amazing, i would like to read more about it, because think that this information is very interesting.

Cheap Viagra Online said...

Thanks for the poem, the science is really interesting i like to watch discovery channel and also natgeo because they entertain me but study science is a waste of time because we would never know from where we come.

Anonymous said...

cool post:)

Anonymous said...

Cool posts

Anonymous said...

Jendela UPVC | Promo Diskon | Harga Tiket Pesawat | Social Bookmarking | Tiket Pesawat Murah | Tiket Pesawat Online

Kim Kardashian Bugil | wallpaper lucu | Ultrabook Notebook Tipis Harga Murah Terbaik | Info Terkini | Harga Notebook | Jasa Seo | Jasa Seo | apa seo | JASA SEO | Layanan Seo | Konsultan Seo | All about Behel atau Kawat Gigi manfaat,perawatan dan larangannya lengkap

I am very enjoyed for this blog. Its an informative topic. It help me very much to solve some problems. Its opportunity are so fantastic and working style so speedy. I think it may be help all of you. Thanks.

Post a Comment