Subscribe: by Email | in Reader

The Walrus and the Carpenter -- Lewis Carroll

(Poem #347) The Walrus and the Carpenter
The sun was shining on the sea,
  Shining with all his might:
He did his very best to make
  The billows smooth and bright --
And this was odd, because it was
  The middle of the night.

The moon was shining sulkily,
  Because she thought the sun
Had got no business to be there
  After the day was done --
'It's very rude of him.' she said,
  'To come and spoil the fun!'

The sea was wet as wet could be,
  The sands were dry as dry.
You could not see a cloud, because
  No cloud was in the sky:
No birds were flying overhead --
  There were no birds to fly.

The Walrus and the Carpenter
  Were walking close at hand:
They wept like anything to see
  Such quantities of sand:
'If this were only cleared away,'
  They said, 'it would be grand.'

'If seven maids with seven mops
  Swept it for half a year,
Do you suppose,' the Walrus said,
  'That they could get it clear?'
'I doubt it,' said the Carpenter,
  And shed a bitter tear.

'O Oysters, come and walk with us!
  The Walrus did beseech.
'A pleasant walk, a pleasant talk,
  Along the briny beach:
We cannot do with more than four,
  To give a hand to each.'

The eldest Oyster looked at him,
  But never a word he said:
The eldest Oyster winked his eye,
  And shook his heavy head --
Meaning to say he did not choose
  To leave the oyster-bed.

Out four young Oysters hurried up.
  All eager for the treat:
Their coats were brushed, their faces washed,
  Their shoes were clean and neat --
And this was odd, because, you know,
  They hadn't any feet.

Four other Oysters followed them,
  And yet another four;
And thick and fast they came at last,
  And more, and more, and more --
All hopping through the frothy waves,
  And scrambling to the shore.

The Walrus and the Carpenter
  Walked on a mile or so,
And then they rested on a rock
  Conveniently low:
And all the little Oysters stood
  And waited in a row.

'The time has come,' the Walrus said,
  'To talk of many things:
Of shoes -- and ships -- and sealing wax --
  Of cabbages -- and kings --
And why the sea is boiling hot --
  And whether pigs have wings.'

'But wait a bit,' the Oysters cried,
  'Before we have our chat;
For some of us are out of breath,
  And all of us are fat!'
'No hurry!' said the Carpenter.
  They thanked him much for that.

'A loaf of bread,' the Walrus said,
  'Is what we chiefly need:
Pepper and vinegar besides
  Are very good indeed --
Now, if you're ready, Oysters dear,
  We can begin to feed.'

'But not on us!' the Oysters cried,
  Turning a little blue.
'After such kindness, that would be
  A dismal thing to do!'
'The night is fine,' the Walrus said,
  'Do you admire the view?'

'It was so kind of you to come!
  And you are very nice!'
The Carpenter said nothing but
  'Cut us another slice-
I wish you were not quite so deaf-
  I've had to ask you twice!'

'It seems a shame,' the Walrus said,
  'To play them such a trick.
After we've brought them out so far,
  And made them trot so quick!'
The Carpenter said nothing but
  'The butter's spread too thick!'

'I weep for you,'the Walrus said:
  'I deeply sympathize.'
With sobs and tears he sorted out
  Those of the largest size,
Holding his pocket-handkerchief
  Before his streaming eyes.

'O Oysters,' said the Carpenter,
  'You've had a pleasant run!
Shall we be trotting home again?'
  But answer came there none --
And this was scarcely odd, because
  They'd eaten every one.
-- Lewis Carroll
I've said it before and I'll say it again: writing good nonsense verse
is _hard_... I don't know how Carroll manages to do it with such
consummate ease.

What I find especially interesting is the way Carroll plays with so many
different _kinds_ of nonsense. For instance, the opening stanza (my
favourite one, btw) of today's poem reads like a piece of juvenilia
straight out of a high-school poetry class (or, even worse, a Victorian
children's book) - that is, until the brilliantly deadpan final couplet
[1], which catches readers completely off-balance with its reversal of
all that is 'normal'.

Indeed, that final couplet sets the tone for the rest of the poem -
snippets like

'The Walrus and the Carpenter
  Were walking close at hand:
They wept like anything to see
  Such quantities of sand:'


'Their coats were brushed, their faces washed,
  Their shoes were clean and neat --
And this was odd, because, you know,
  They hadn't any feet.'

and of course the famous:

''The time has come,' the Walrus said,
  'To talk of many things:
Of shoes -- and ships -- and sealing wax --
  Of cabbages -- and kings --
And why the sea is boiling hot --
  And whether pigs have wings.''

are dazzling in their simplicity and sheer meaninglessness. And the
whole poem is written in the same vein - simple, matter-of-fact, and
utterly bizarre.

I suppose the key to Carroll's particular brand of lunacy is
_incongruity_. In 'Jabberwocky', the incongruity is verbal, with
invented words and strange constructions. In 'The Mad Gardener's Song',
the incongruity is one of non sequiturs. In today's poem, it's one of
situation. Each type is different (and difficult); yet each type is
handled to a nicety. Sheer genius.


[Minstrels Links]

[1] I hadn't thought of it before, but yes, this does fit in nicely with
Martin's comments of Saturday - you can read them at poem #345

Jabberwocky: poem #52

The Mad Gardener's Song: poem #265

[End Note]

Those of you with good memories (or lots of disk space) will remember
that the Minstrels held a poetry-reading session in the Real World,
about a month ago, at the Crossword bookstore in Mumbai. It went off
pretty well (I thought), and plans are afoot to make it (the poetry
session) a monthly affair. If you're interested in attending the next
edition, do email me or Seema Bhatia (note the
double underscore) and we'll take it from there.

58 comments: ( or Leave a comment )

Nathan Smith said...

This poem by the outstanding writer and poet Lewis Carrol is not, in fact, sheer nonsensical writing. It is an obvious reference to ancient and modern religion. The Walrus, with it's large and rotund physical attributes, seems to be referring to buddha or gamesha of the eastern religions. The Carpenter is is an obvious reference to Christ, who was brought up a carpenter. When one stops and thinks, the poem is, quite frankly, the author's perception of religion in modern times. The characters in the poem trick a bunch of oysters (people?) into following them, after which the two devour the helpless creatures. Anyone agree or have further insight? Email me at . N. Smith

IamBubber said...

I am curious to read further discussion of the meaning of this poem. I am
not familiar with any poetry but will be spending two weeks abroad with my 15
year old niece who just won a poetry recitation with this poem and I would
like to learn more about it so I can discuss it with her.

I initally perceived the story as that of a "warning" to children that there
are mean, manipulative authority figures out there that are not quite what
they appear to be. But your explanation took it to the next level and I
found it to be very logical.

I was wondering if you got any feedback from your question "Anyone agree or
have further insight?"
regarding The Walrus And The Carpenter.

I appreciate any insight or discussion you can offer.

Nathan Smith said...


Thank you for your time in giving a response to my recent posting. As a matter of fact, you are the first to respond so far, and I can see where you are coming from with your ideas of the meaning of Carroll's The Walrus and the Carpenter. I still believe that the poem is pertaining to religion, but if you have an "argument" on your behalf, I would enjoy to hear your thoughts on the matter. Also, I would like to add that the line: "It seems a shame," the Walrus said, "To play them such a trick. After we've brought them out so far, And made them trot so quick!" is another reference to the gods of the world religions. Can you see what I mean? If anyone does, please let me know. Once again, it's . Thank you.

Someone out there said...

If you read the poem you will find many refrences to religion/politics/big bussines/england at the time however you care to interpert it.
religion is most apparent to me the number 7 which is very biblical is refered to throghout the poem (6 lines and a space and 7 maids) also the carpenter keeps asking for bread, staple around1bc
also the walrus could be peter and clams disples following jesus to the end
if you look at it as political the walrus and carpenter represent different political parties but you end up with the same thing in the end, both eating bread with toppings and still want more- they always want more
big bussines interpertation is very similar to the political
it could also represent england durring the colonial period, clams/colonies, taking all the good from them without actually helping them
In any of these interpertations the eldest clam could represent lewis carol and that he see them for what they are, although the big clam doesn't really work for colonial interpertation because colonies didn't have a choice about joining england and america was a colony for a long time
I take no credit for coming up with the main ideas but i did add my interpertations of some parts, i mainly did this for myself to help me orginize my thoughts before i have to do a project on the poem so dont e-mail me with with your thoughts please

Allison Lingenfelter said...

I completely agree with the interpetation. I just taught this to a class and they thought that I was crazy and wondered where I got the religious, business idea from. I am glad that someone else reached the same conclusion that I did.

Nairwita said...

well it was god one 'someone out there' i liked it.

Naked_Jellybean said...

Nathan Smith's comment on this poem come from the movie "Dogma" which is written and directed by Kevin Smith. The scene is close to the beginning of the movie where the angel Loki is trying to convince a nun that religion is stupid. Here is the exact text from the movie (compare it closely to Nathan's):

Nun: Let me get this straight. You don't believe in God because of "Alice in Wonderland?"

Loki: No, Through the Looking Glass. That poem, "The Walrus and the Carpenter," thats an indictment of orginized religion. The walrus, with his girth and good nature, he obviously represents either Buddha, or with his tusks the Hindu elephant god, Lord Ganesha. Now that takes care of your Eastern religions. Now the carpenter, which is an obvious reference to Jesus Christ who was raised a carpenter's son, he represents the Western religions. Now in the poem what do they do? They dupe all of these oysters into following them and procede to shuck and devour the helpless creatures en masse. I don't know what that says to your, but to me it says that following these faiths, based on mytholoical figures ensures the destruction of one's inner-being. Orginized religion destroys who we are, by inhibiting our actions, inhibiting our decisions, out of fear of some intangible parent figure who shakes a finger at us from thousands of years ago and says, "Do it and I'll f*cking spank you!"

Hope this helps out some. Oh, and I suggest to everyone the movie "Dogma."


Mickey Krebs said...

One day a Fr. Rutler, a well know priest, was walking across his campus and
saw Robert Frost walking along and hurried to catch up with him so that he
might get a chance to chat with this illustrious poet who was teaching there
at the time. He asked Robert Frost what his own interpretation of the "The
Road Less Traveled" was expecting some deep psychological meaning. The poet
answered "oh I was just talking about the two roads there in Boston" and he
named them and that was all he said.

I think that to get a religous meaning out of this poem is to analyze to the
extreme. Perhaps, the poem is merely about life and the ups and downs of
life and somehow or other things don't always work out the way we'd like.

I teach poetry and its interpretation can stretched, I think, to confirm
anyone's particular bias and as I showed by the example above, the poet
probably had hardly anything in mind. Maybe Lewis Carroll liked the
nonsense of it and it kept the theme of nonsense going that is visible in
"Through a Looking Glass". Lewis is showing a rather mixed up world in
values all the way around.


Morgan.Chaivre said...

subject: history of Walrus and the Carpenter

I realize that this board was posted a while ago, but after reading the
posts, I just had to respond. Okay, those of you who are firm believers
in the "Carpenter as Christ" theory, that's a very popular idea and
well-supported, especially since Lewis Carroll described himself as
being pretty religous. However, please keep in mind that Carroll left
the choosing of the character of the carpenter up to John Tenniel, the
illustrator. Carroll offered Tenniel a choice of drawing a carpenter,
butterfly, or baronet. Each word fit the rhyme scheme, and Carroll had
no preference so far as the nonsense was concerned. Tenniel chose the
carpenter. I don't know how religious John Tenniel was, but it is worth
looking up. Also, just a fun piece of trivia, some years after writing
the poem, Carroll decided that the story should end with the Walrus and
the Carpenter being punished for their cruelty. So, when a musical
version was being prepared, he wrote some additional lines in which the
ghosts of the oysters take revenge on the Walrus and the Carpenter by
jumping on their chests while they slept (AKA indigestion)!

Morgan Chaivre

Anna Hickling said...


Elizabeth said...

Sorry to be a complete stranger asking a silly question out of the blue, so
to speak... However...

Do you happen to have any further information about the alternative wording
for the Walrus and the Carpenter that yo alluded to? I'm intensely intrigued
after reading your thread in the conversation regarding this. I would very
much like to see this alternative version, but have no idea where to start
looking, other than asking you.

I'd be very grateful if you could assist me with this...


E. Campbell

Sarah said...

I've heard of the religious references for some time, but what always
surprises me is that no one catches the Pagan/Wiccan reference to the
Sun God and Moon Goddess:

"The sun was shining on the sea,
Shining with all his might:
He did his very best to make
The billows smooth and bright--
And this was odd, because it was
The middle of the night.

The moon was shining sulkily,
Because she thought the sun
Had got no business to be there
After the day was done--
'It's very rude of him.' she said,
'To come and spoil the fun!'

Obviously, the Moon (Goddess) is upset at being overshadowed, and
ultimately made non-existent, by the the Sun (God).

-Bethey sun was shining on the sea,
Shining with all his might:
He did his very best to make
The billows smooth and bright --
And this was odd, because it was
The middle of the night.

The moon was shining sulkily,
Because she thought the sun
Had got no business to be there
After the day was done --
'It's very rude of him.' she said,
'To come and spoil the fun!'

morambar said...

An indictment of Christianity from a Divinity School graduate/professor and ministers son with religious ambitions does seem a bit, well, odd.... Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and it's worth noting that, if the Carpenter was selected "multiple guess" by someone besides Carroll, substitution of ANY other sea creature returns the focus of analysis to the situation and away from the characters. Personally, I see at as a morality tale warning the young to look gift horses in the mouth.

I might be willing to accept an interpretation as a criticism of ORGANIZED religion, or at least its perils (something about which Jesus was Himself far more overt and explicit) were it not for the intricate relationship between Carroll and Christianity as an institution. That said, I can only imagine how Buddha would view his deification by some Buddhist disciplines (given that he took the material positivist view that Deity is unknowable and therefore, whether real or imagined, a fruitless intellectuall pursuit) or Christs view of the "Pharisizing" of so many "Christian" churches.

Morgan Chaivre said...

While Carroll never actually wrote any version of the poem with any other character than the carpenter, he did add an alternate ending to the poem for an operetta of Alice in Wonderland. In the alternate ending, the ghosts of the oysters proceed to jump up and down on the chests of the Walrus and the Carpenter, thereby giving them heartburn. He added this ending because he was convinced that theatrical life could be physically, intellectually, and morally strengthening to children, making him feel he had to somehow punish the Walrus and the Carpenter. For those of you who are interested, here is the alternate ending, just tacked on to the ending we all know:

The Carpenter he ceased to sob;
The Walrus ceased to weep;
They'd finished all the oysters;
And they laid them down to sleep--
And od their craft and cruelty
The punishment to reap.

The Carpenter is sleeping, the butter's
on his face,
The vinegar and pepper are all about
the place!
Let oysters rock your cradle and hull
you into rest;
And if that will not do it, we'll sit
upon your chest!

(the ghost of the first oyster sings)

We'll sit upon your chest! We'll sit
upon your chest!
The simplest way to do it is to sit
upon your chest!

(the ghost of the second oyster sings)

O woeful, weeping Walrus, your
tears are all a sham!
You're greedier for Oysters than
children are for jam.
You like to have an Oyster to give
a meal a zest--
Excuse me, wicked Walrus,
for stamping on your chest!
For stamping on your chest!
For stamping on your chest!
Excuse me, wicked Walrus,
For stamping on your chest!

Morgan Chaivre

Morgan Chaivre said...

I forgot to add that the alternate ending can be found in Martin Gardner's The Annotated Alice. Also, if you're interested in Lewis Carroll, a great book to get is Lewis Carroll in Wonderland: The Life and Times of Alice and Her Creator. It's pocket-sized and packed with great photos and illustrations.

Morgan Chaivre

KerryB3858 said...

My father was a 2nd Lieutenant on the Destroyer USS Lang at the end of the
Pacific campaign of WWII. He quoted this poem a lot. Cover of darkness was
safest; bright nights, or overhead flares left them vulnerable. The oysters--the
poor unquestioning soldiers who pay the price. He would've loved to see all
those endless sandy beaches disappear, but to think of many such things --
Well, ill-fitting Navy issue shoes, warships, letters from home, the time the
crew left a whole load of cabbages on deck so it could roll off (preventing farts
belowdeck!), and we could talk of the kings in control of all this, but,
--"when pigs fly..." Poetry has kept my dad sane through a lot, and meant a lot
to him. He drew his own parallels, obviously. Before today, I never knew this
wasn't a poem about homesick sailors and their captains.

lelainehowell said...

Carroll was a drug user. This could and probably is just a vision he had while he was tripping.

Anonymous said...

walrus' suk boiz

javieth said...

Very interesting blog!!! i liked it, most of all for the new ideas that this blog talk. I must to say it catched my attention since the first time that i read it. I usually like everything that can give me what i am looking for. So i advice you buy viagra, the result is amazing!!!

Anonymous said...

I think that if the carpenter was meant to represent jesus he wouldnt be out to eat the oasters , he would probably be out to steal their money and fill them full of lies

Aarya said...

Its a very nice poem.............!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I liked it.........!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I hope there are many more poems written by Lewis Carroll like this one..........!!!!!!!!!!
It's a fun poem.........!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Please remember that Carroll wrote this poem for children, not politicians or religious critiscs ect. I think that Lewis Carroll's poems can be viewed in any way you want, but since they were written for children, I don't think he intended to have any deeper meaning.

Anonymous said...

The poem, (in my opinion) is a reference to false prophets or snake oil salesmen as it were. There reel in with great promises of wisdom and adventure the continue to 'consume' and live of the subtance of those foolish enough to follow thwm.

Happy Panda said...

Lewis Carroll was a deeply religious man, the explanations above, that he would be portraying religion in that manor, I believe are inaccurate. He took great exception if anyone used the name of God in vain or in humor, and would never attend any theatrical enterprise that bore the slightest whiff of disrespect or indecency.

Anonymous said...

I agree that this poem really has no meaning and that everyone is just reading far more into it then they should. Lewis Carroll gave the artist for the book 3 options for this poem-butterfly,Carpender and one other one I cant remeber. Carroll didnt care which one because they all fit into the poem. If carpenter was changed to butterfly would it still represent something? I dont think so.

Anonymous said...

I am scanning this poem and I have discovered that the poem is in all iAMBic tremeter and tetrameter, interesting

Royce said...

I found this after watching Dogma and hearing the character Loki's interpretation of the poem as an indictment of religion. Everyones comments were really interesting and informative, but I think Carroll's intentions probably fell somewhere in the middle. Carroll being religious probably didn't mean for the poem as an outright criticism of Christianity, but I think Carroll was intelligent and aware enough write something more than an absolutely nonsensical poem. Either way I don't think Carroll's intentions are all that important, everyone's interpretations, with the exception of the spambots, have made sense and were informative and that's really all that matters.

Anonymous said...

I strongly suspect that if Lewis Carroll is looking down and reading this thread, he'll be smiling at the downright daftness of the interpretations.

The truth is - we'll never know whether he intended the poem to be anything more than the nonsense it first appears.

There is enough actual EVIDENCE to suggest that he didn't mean anything more. So I think it does literature, in general, a dis-service by trying to retro fit an interpretation to it.

Space Matters Real Estates said...

Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I will definitely return. Plots for sale in Hyderabad
Plots for sale in Banjara Hills
Plots for sale in Jubilee Hills
Plots for sale in Manikonda
Plots for sale in Madhapur
Plots for sale in kondapur
Plots for sale in Gachibowli
Plots for sale in Kukatpally

Anonymous said...

LOL, the spambots on this blog (Walrus & Carpenter) are exploiting the bloggers (oysters) here!

Anonymous said...

Amazing thread.
[mostly] everyone here has touched on so many key points and drawn in so many parallels to subjects which I have found meaningful to myself that I am indeed starting to wonder whether I too, much like the White Queen, am in possession of the type of memory which works forwards, backwards, and in every sort of direction.
With that being said, is anyone else of the opinion that the 'chest jumping upon' oysters could have been a precursor to, or inspiration for, Dr. Seuss' Pop Hopping?

Just tossing it out there....

Anonymous said...

Amazing thread.
[mostly] everyone here has touched on so many key points and drawn on so many parallels to subjects which I have found meaningful to myself that I am indeed starting to wonder whether I too, much like the White Queen, am in possession of the type of memory which works forwards, backwards, and in most every sort of direction.
With that being said, is anyone else of the opinion that the 'chest jumping upon' oysters could have been a precursor to, or inspiration for, Dr. Seuss' Pop Hopping?

Just tossing it out there....

Anonymous said...

Please delete the above comment as it is poorer version of the following one, though from the past.
Oops. :)

Emenaccallcenterservices said...

Are you related to the IT business in any way? Do you think handling the varying needs of customers takes a lot of your time or would require a large sum of money? If you think yes, you need to call Emenac Call Center Services right today at our toll-free number +1.888.909.2207 and get all the help that you desire. We provide a wide range of call center services to help you gather a loyal clientele or expand the already existing one. In whatever way you will desire, ecallcenterservices will provide your customer with IT help desk and make your life easier.
Without charging much, we will save your time and make things simpler for you.

polo outlet said...

Paul Reed said...

The article posted was very informative and useful. You people are doing a great job. Bhutan Travel | CHILD EDUCATION LAW | Keep going.

Michael Syaukas said...

Nice Post, Thanks for your very useful information... I will bookmark for next reference

j wetherell said...

"The time has come," the Walrus said,
"To talk of many things:
Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
Of cabbages—and kings—
And why the sea is boiling hot—
And whether pigs have wings."
—Through the Looking-Glass
The characters of the Walrus and the Carpenter have been interpreted many ways both in literary criticism and popular culture. Some, including the character Loki in the film Dogma, interpret the Walrus to be a caricature of the Buddha and the Carpenter to be a caricature of Jesus Christ.[1] British essayist J.B. Priestley argued that the figures were political.[2] However, in The Annotated Alice, Martin Gardner notes that, when Carroll gave the manuscript for Looking Glass to illustrator John Tenniel, he gave him the choice of drawing a carpenter, a butterfly, or a baronet since each word would fit the poem's metre. Because Tenniel rather than Carroll chose the carpenter, the character's significance in the poem is probably not in his profession, and interpretations of the poem as a commentary on religion are likely false. Gardner cautions the reader that there is not always intended symbolism in the Alice books, which were made for the imagination of children and not the analysis of "mad people".

From wikipedia-

cecillia said...

Terimaksih telah berbagi infonya,,sukses selalu untuk info and specifications car toyota and motorcycle , minimalist bedroom design , price and specifications mazda , minimalist livingroom design websitenya,,,and be the best to the next info,,

Indian News said...

We have the quality carpenters we deal with all types of carpentry works in hyderabad. We are the Best Carpenters in Hyderabad

agus said...

semua telah tersaji dengan sempurna melalui website ini.. informasi yang akuarat cara panjangkan penis tajam dan terpercaya.. thanks mas bro telah rela berbagi dengan kami.

nhgh said...

Info yang diberikan bagus sekali, semoga review honda city menjadi berkah dan price Kawasaki Z800 bermanfaat bagi kita semua memang website yang keren memang harus begini,selalu mengedepankan kepuasan dan banyak memberi specifications honda freed manfaat bagi pengunjungnya. advantages toyota yaris

Nike Free said...

For a nation emerging from the Depression and headed into World War II, the vibrancy and can-do spirit of Rooney's screen persona proved irresistible. He stood only 5-foot-3, but he was huge, ranking as the top box-office star from 1939 through 1941 (and certainly one of the best-paid actors of that era) thanks to the appeal of his work as an all-American kid in the Andy Hardy franchise; 10 musicals opposite another prodigy, Judy Garland; and other classics such as Boys Town and National Velvet. In 1939, the Academy awarded Rooney a special juvenile Oscar, and michael kors tote in the next five years, he twice was nom-inated for the real thing. (No male since has landed a best actor Oscar nom at a younger age.) He would go on to receive two more noms — for The Bold and the Brave (1956) and The Black Stallion (1979) — and pick up an Honorary michael kors stores Oscar, too, in 1983. No less a thespian than Laurence Olivier called him "the best there has ever been."
"Turning away from the more urban look of Fall '11, there is an effortlessness to his new collection, like wearing a boyfriend tee as a dress," according to the post.Taylor Schilling walked the red carpet in michael kors outlet online store 49.00 outlet a black Michael Kors gown at the 2015 Tony Awards at Radio City Music Hall in New York City on Sunday night. Michael Kors showed his fall 2015 show at Manhattan's Spring Street Studios on Wednesday. And in true Kors fashion, there was no shortage of star power milling about. Kate Hudson, Allison Williams and michael kors outlet online Leigh Lezark sat front and center, as did stylists Rachel Zoe and Kate Young, who bopped to the tunes of Beck and Florence and the Machine as models Lily Aldridge, Alexander Richards, Kendall Jenner and Karlie Kloss worked the runway.
The contemporary storyline begins with the sudden death of Kaulder's longtime friend and mentor Dolan michael kors purses the 36th, reliably played by Caine in grandfatherly post-Batman mode. After sniffing out evidence of black magic, the witch hunter teams up with Dolan's young successor Dolan the 37th (Wood) and benign white witch Chloe (Leslie) in a race against time to track down a powerful Nordic warlock called Belial (Olafur Darri Olafsson) who plans michael kors bags to resurrect the Witch Queen and unleash a fresh global plague.

Obat Herbal said...

Seberat apapun beban masalah yang kamu hadapi saat ini, percayalah bahwa semua itu tidak pernah melebihi batas kemampuan kamu.

Nike Free said...

Jordan Brand‘s 2016 release slate is still relitively unknown, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing – we always like jordans 2016 surprises. As for the revamped girls line, it looks like the Jumpman is starting to get creative with materials Jordan Retro 8 Concord as this Air Jordan 4 returns with an all-denim upper. The black base features an Americana finish thanks to jordans 2015 the jean-like material while accents of Vivid Pink hold down the lining, midsole, and tongue logo. It’s a unique new jordans look that’s sure to create some interest among grade school girls, and will release this January 16th at retailers jordan 11 like Finish Line. Check new jordan shoes out more retail shots below and stay tuned for more release date updates right here on Sneaker News.
We’ll never know just how deep the Nike/Jordan Brand vault goes, but occasionally we’ll come across an unreleased sample that jordan shoes raises a bunch of “what ifs”. This Air Jordan 3 Retro sample from 2011 never hit stores, and according Air Jordan 4 Alternate 89 to the person in possession of this sample, only three pairs in total are in existence. It’s not often jordans for sale that Nike makes such a tiny number of one particular shoe so there may be more pairs around, but Jordan 5 fire red the seller alleges that the only other pairs are in the hands of Nike big-wigs. In any case, peep jordan releases these “Bred” Air Jordan 3 samples below and find the full listing on eBay.

Post a Comment