Thanks to Sunil Iyengar for suggesting today's poem
(Poem #604) Euclid Alone Has Looked On Beauty Bare Euclid alone has looked on Beauty bare. Let all who prate of Beauty hold their peace, And lay them prone upon the earth and cease To ponder on themselves, the while they stare At nothing, intricately drawn nowhere In shapes of shifting lineage; let geese Gabble and hiss, but heroes seek release From dusty bondage into luminous air. O blinding hour, O holy, terrible day, When first the shaft into his vision shone Of light anatomized! Euclid alone Has looked on Beauty bare. Fortunate they Who, though once only and then but far away, Have heard her massive sandal set on stone. |
I'm afraid that this is not one of my favourite Millay poems - much as I usually love her work, I feel that she has failed to do the subject justice (or, perhaps, that the matter doesn't really suit her style; either way, it lacks the feel of her really great pieces). However, it does fit very neatly into the theme, and is worth a read, if as much for its symbolism as for the actual poem. The comparison of mathematical insight to a divine revelation, for instance, is a rather standard image, but one that springs naturally to mind, for reasons not too hard to see - most of the universe can be explained using a judicious combination of mathematics and religion :). Also very interesting is the parallel drawn between the transcendence into beauty and the transition from sound to light. Mathematics seems to have associated with it a certain abstract purity that finds its closest reflection in our images of space and light, or perhaps light comes closest to the geometric ideal of a straight line (one of the cornerstones of practically all mathematics, and certainly one of the key tools in its development). And of course, there is the obvious reference back to the light/revelation image, The basic form is Petrarchan, with a slightly unusual rhyme scheme in the sestet (though see http://www.sonnets.org/basicforms.htm - the sestet had a pretty flexible rhyme scheme). Notable is the fairly heavy use of alliteration, which adds to the poem's somewhat 'weighty' feel. As an afterthought, this heaviness is probably my main objection to the poem - Millay has tried to capture both the majesty and the ethereal nature of mathematics, but has associated with the former a weight that is quite at variance with the latter. Note: Euclid is probably one of the most famous, and certainly one of the most influential mathematicians of all time; his 'Elements', a massive compilation of the mathematical knowledge of time time revolutionised the field, setting the standard for rigour that even now characterises mathematics. Almost from the time of its writing and lasting almost to the present, the Elements has exerted a continuous and major influence on human affairs. It was the primary source of geometric reasoning, theorems, and methods at least until the advent of non-Euclidean geometry in the 19th century. It is sometimes said that, next to the Bible, the Elements may be the most translated, published, and studied of all the books produced in the Western world. Euclid may not have been a first-class mathematician. He certainly was, however, a first-class teacher of mathematics, inasmuch as his textbook has remained in use practically unchanged for more than 2,000 years. -- EB I could go on about Euclid for several pages; however, inasmuch as this is a poetry list I'll leave you to explore the several excellent books and webpages about him and his work yourselves <g>. Links: Here's a biography of Millay: poem #34 And two of Euclid: [broken link] http://www.treasure-troves.com/bios/Euclid.html http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Euclid.html And here is one of his more celebrated theorems - 'beauty bare' indeed! [broken link] http://www.math.umd.edu/~krc/numbers/infitude.html -martin
7 comments: ( or Leave a comment )
I think you're driving with twos wheels off the road. That's actually a comment about deconstruction criticism, but it suits yours here. Maybe you're uncomfortable with Millay's actual point and prefer not to find it. Millay is not a poet whose meaning one has to "FEEL." So, the fact that this poem is hard to grasp and leaves the reader little apparent choice but to "feel" what it means IS a problem. But my response is to go on trying to analyze it until I've actually fully understood it and to bite my tongue until I've done that.
I tried my own interpretation once: see my blog entry from five years ago. See what you think.
I have adored this poem since first reading it over 30 years ago. Most of us will never have complete and intuitive insight into beauty or anything else, not through mathematics, not through music. We adumbrate what true genius grasps, collates, and conveys through imperfect material models. We contemplate from without, satisfied to perceive and admire something which cannot approximate what was experienced at the source. The notes on the page cannot contain what Chopin heard, the most sublime architectural forms are a flawed reflection of the undrawn geometry of straight line and absolute point, the asymptote receding into eternity. In this temple the columns uphold the sky perfectly, the scale without comma, the year perfectly divisible.
Folks, have none of you thought about this poem as a rebuke to "Ode to a Grecian Urn?"
I'm a scientist/applied mathematician and I read it very clearly that way. Doesn't "let all those who prate of beauty hold their peace" directly slam Keats and many others ... through the Byron/Ruskin appreciations onward?
Similarly I see "Euclid" as a subtle dig at "Grecian," and also wonder what background Edna had in math and science (why "Euclid alone..."), although Euclid was the acme of math for many in her generation, those never going on to calculus etc.
Formal geometry is "bare" ... very 'simple,' harsh, abstract and pure, unadorned by artifice. Even more to the point it is independent of taste, and in principle universally accessible. Alien intelligences would arrive at Euclidean geometry.
It is anti-poetry in most regards, another irony here and one I think Edna is playing on.
Dear Anonymous,
I am also a scientist/mathematician who reads poetry (I thought I was the only one!) and I also wondered what background Edna had in mathematics and why Euclid was the only one who got to see Beauty in the Buff. However, even if you are correct that Edna was taking a poke at Keats, her poke took the form of an argument, in a sense saying, "no, you're wrong, real beauty is deeper than mere appearance (i.e. the sort of reality math deals with). Your comment makes it sound as if her poem was *only* a 'rebuke'. But I think that she also had her own point to make. Also, sadly Euclid never got to see the ultimately beautiful equation: e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0.
I was searching for more details about Euclid (for my wife, as she is studying to be teacher in Mathematics). Thank you for the wonderful poem and each of your comments. Internet is amazing, day-by-day.....
Tiket Pesawat Murah | Sari Jahe | Promo | Info Promo Diskon Hari Ini | Diskon | Promo Diskon | Harga Tiket Pesawat | Temulawak | Photo Prewedding | UPVC WINDOW | Social Bookmarking | Kamera CCTV | Jual CCTV | Pasang CCTV | Minuman Suplemen | Tiket Pesawat Murah | Harga Tiket Pesawat | Tiket Pesawat Online
Kim Kardashian Bugil | wallpaper lucu | Ultrabook Notebook Tipis Harga Murah Terbaik | Info Terkini | Harga Notebook | Jasa Seo | Jasa Seo | apa seo | Layanan Seo | Konsultan Seo
I am very enjoyed for this blog. Its an informative topic. It help me very much to solve some problems. Its opportunity are so fantastic and working style so speedy. I think it may be help all of you. Thanks.
Post a Comment